<div dir="ltr">Yes, Joe, it would. <div><br><div>From a systematic point of view: are we positioning also other issues with regard to the question whether they are &quot;considered <span style="font-size:12.8px"> </span><span style="font-size:12.8px">as a limiting factor to the consideration of the  proposal&quot; ? </span></div></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Michael</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:50 AM, joseph alhadeff <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    overall.  Would that word as a modifier to comments address the
    confusion?  the majority of overall comments...<br>
    <br>
    <div>On 10/22/2015 6:47 AM, michael niebel
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Agree. Just one question: does the last sentence &quot;
        The majority of comments ..&quot; mean the majority of comments that
        raised the jurisdiction issue or the overall majority of
        comments ?
        <div>Michael</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Jandyr
          Ferreira dos Santos Junior <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:jandyr.santos@itamaraty.gov.br" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:jandyr.santos@itamaraty.gov.br" target="_blank">jandyr.santos@itamaraty.gov.br</a>&gt;</span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Likewise.<br>
            <br>
            Joe&#39;s text is accurate and does not predetermine the scope
            of the discussion on jurisdiction post-transition.<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            Jandyr<br>
            ________________________________________<br>
            De: Internal-cg [<a href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org" target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a>]
            em nome de Drazek, Keith [<a href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com" target="_blank">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>]<br>
            Enviado: quinta-feira, 22 de outubro de 2015 8:30<br>
            Para: joseph alhadeff; <a href="mailto:internal-cg@ianacg.org" target="_blank">internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br>
            Assunto: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible<br>
            <br>
            I support Joe&#39;s proposed jurisdiction language below. It is
            factual and does not seek to predetermine the scope of
            discussion post-transition.<br>
            <br>
            Keith<br>
            <br>
            -----Original Message-----<br>
            From: Internal-cg [mailto:<a href="mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org" target="_blank">internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org</a>]
            On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff<br>
            Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:20 AM<br>
            To: <a href="mailto:internal-cg@ianacg.org" target="_blank">internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br>
            Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Possible<br>
            <br>
            Possible text on Jurisdiction:<br>
            <br>
            A number of comments highlighted the issue of Jurisdiction
            as important.  A minority objected to any transition at all
            because they perceived that US was relinquishing
            jurisdiction.  Another minority point of view raised
            concerns that the jurisdiction was not international or
            outside of the US.  A number of comments also suggested that
            CCWG Workstream 2 might be a place to address some of the
            continued<br>
            concerns about jurisdiction.    The majority of comments did
            not find<br>
            jurisdiction as a limiting factor to the consideration
            proposal.<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Internal-cg mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
            <a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Internal-cg mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
            <a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Internal-cg mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
            <a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div>

</blockquote></div><br></div>