<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.hoenzb
{mso-style-name:hoenzb;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">A very heartfelt +1 to Kavouss here!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Kavouss Arasteh<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 15 October 2015 16:46<br>
<b>To:</b> Patrik F�ltstr�m; Alissa Cooper; Mohamed El Bashir<br>
<b>Cc:</b> ICG<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Internal-cg] Comment received on the ICG forum<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">No comments on the objection raised by Richard,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">But pls kindly avoid to open a new and boring round of discussion on what consensus signifies. You never reach any conclusion .<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kavouss <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2015-10-15 14:25 GMT+02:00 Patrik F�ltstr�m <<a href="mailto:paf@frobbit.se" target="_blank">paf@frobbit.se</a>>:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">On 6 Oct 2015, at 19:08, Jennifer Chung wrote:<br>
<br>
> Please find the comment received on the ICG forum, details below:<br>
><br>
><br>
> Tuesday 6 Oct: Richard Hill - "How are you defining consensus?" -<br>
> <a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-October/000006.html" target="_blank">
http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-October/000006.html</a><br>
><br>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.<br>
<br>
Suggested description, to be confirmed by ICG:<br>
<br>
ICG do separate consensus for the content of the proposals from each one of the operational communities from consensus that the proposals are implementable (etc). ICG validates that the operational communities do have consensus for the proposals put forward
to ICG and then seek consensus in ICG for the compatibility.<br>
<br>
In this process, we have separated the objections in three categories:<br>
<br>
- Comments that do believe NTIA made the wrong decision, which are out of scope for ICG<br>
<br>
- Comments that are on each OC proposal, which has consensus already within each OC, where ICG validate with the OC that the issue have been discussed already (that the correct process have been followed)<br>
<br>
- Comments that are on the ICG evaluation on interoperability and compatibility<br>
<br>
On the last point, after reviewing the public comments, the ICG has consensus that the proposals are compatible and interoperable.<br>
<span style="color:#888888"><br>
<span class="hoenzb"> Patrik F�ltstr�m</span><br>
<span class="hoenzb"> ICG Co-chair</span><br>
</span><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>