<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Hi Milton,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Jumping down to the text proposal:</div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Oct 12, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Mueller, Milton L <<a href="mailto:milton.mueller@pubpolicy.gatech.edu" class="">milton.mueller@pubpolicy.gatech.edu</a>> wrote:</div><div class=""><div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;" class=""> </span><br class=""><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: red;" class="">The CWG-Stewardship has confirmed to the ICG that the creation of an arrangement between the IFO and the RZM has not been addressed in their proposal. The CWG now prefers to let those relationships be defined by a separate and parallel process run by the NTIA.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class=""><o:p class=""></o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class=""> </span></div><blockquote style="margin-top: 5pt; margin-bottom: 5pt;" class=""><div class=""><div style="border-style: none none none solid; border-left-color: blue; border-left-width: 1.5pt; padding: 0in 0in 0in 4pt;" class=""><div class=""><blockquote style="margin-top: 5pt; margin-bottom: 5pt;" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class=""><br class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: red;" class="">The ICG believes that if it is to be legitimate and consistent with the multistakeholder process, this parallel process must be conducted transparently with opportunities for review by the CWG-Stewardship and broader public input, and that the written agreement between the IFO and RZM establish</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class="">ing</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: red;" class=""><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>each party\u2019s role must be in place by the time of the expiry of the NTIA contract.</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><o:p class=""></o:p></span></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class=""><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class=""> </span></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class="">MM: So you are ok with this second part?</span></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">Yes, almost. I think in the first two sentences we need to stick a little more closely to what we actually received in the CWG response:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The CWG has confirmed to the ICG that the details of the arrangement between the IFO and the RZM have not been addressed in their proposal or elsewhere. The CWG understands that those relationships will be defined by a separate and parallel process run by the NTIA. The ICG believes that if it is to be legitimate and consistent with the multistakeholder process, this parallel process must be conducted transparently with opportunities for review by the CWG and broader public input, and that the written agreement between the IFO and RZM establishing each party\u2019s role must be in place by the time of the expiry of the NTIA contract.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Does this work for you?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class="">Alissa</div></body></html>