<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Hi Paul,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks. I have some questions and comments on some of your edits.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Footnote 14: seeing as the numbers proposal and the other two proposals are included verbatim in the document, I think it\u2019s confusing to cite the version hosted at <a href="http://nro.net" class="">nro.net</a>. We do not have similar footnotes for the other two proposals. So I\u2019d prefer to leave this out.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Para 13: I think the point about coordination is a good addition, but I\u2019m not sure it belongs in the summary of the proposal. I\u2019d like to move it down into the interoperability section. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class="">Alissa</div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Oct 8, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Paul Wilson <<a href="mailto:pwilson@apnic.net" class="">pwilson@apnic.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">Agree with Jari - I think the text is in good shape.<br class=""><br class="">All the same I\u2019ve added a few small refinements to the numbers community parts. I\u2019ve also added a bunch of new footnotes, on an assumption of \u201cthe more the better\u201d.<br class=""><br class="">My edits are in the dropbox here:<br class=""><br class=""><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/vw88kaarzni31q8/transition-proposal-part0-v2-formatted-pw.docx?dl=0" class="">https://www.dropbox.com/s/vw88kaarzni31q8/transition-proposal-part0-v2-formatted-pw.docx?dl=0</a><br class=""><br class="">Paul.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">On 9 Oct 2015, at 8:26, Alissa Cooper wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Thanks. I know we did not get to discuss Part 0 on the call today, but I\u2019ve been assuming folks are mostly fine with the text given that it\u2019s been circulated on the list for awhile and I haven\u2019t seen many comments. I will incorporate the actions from today\u2019s call and circulate a complete redline in advance of people traveling to Dublin.<br class=""><br class="">Alissa<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">For what it is worth, my first read of this indicates that the text is<br class="">in good shape; I didn\u2019t have any specific suggestions at this stage.<br class=""><br class="">Overall, there might be a thing or two to lift up from part 0 to<br class="">the executive summary once we are done. (E.g.,the part about<br class="">dependencies to CCWG work.) I also wonder if this is something<br class="">that should lead to writing the \u201cE. ICG Recommendation\u201d text<br class="">slightly differently.<br class=""><br class="">Jari<br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Internal-cg mailing list<br class="">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org<br class="">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Internal-cg mailing list<br class="">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org<br class="">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">________________________________________________________________________<br class="">Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net<br class="">http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>