<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Alissa,</div><div>Tks</div><div>I provided a short brief on the ICG f2f to CCWG call 52 held on 05-07 am today</div><div>By the way what is the situation for modifications to part Zero?</div><div>Kavouss</div><div><br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 22 Sep 2015, at 12:22, Alissa Cooper <<a href="mailto:alissa@cooperw.in">alissa@cooperw.in</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"><div class="">I think the positions of both the IETF and the RIRs are clear. See IAB comments <<a href="https://comments.ianacg.org/pdf/submission/submission72.pdf" class="">https://comments.ianacg.org/pdf/submission/submission72.pdf</a>>, CRISP team comments <<a href="https://comments.ianacg.org/pdf/submission/submission133.pdf" class="">https://comments.ianacg.org/pdf/submission/submission133.pdf</a>>, and the RIRs\u2019 draft SLA <<a href="https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Numbers-SLA-2.0.pdf" class="">https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Numbers-SLA-2.0.pdf</a>>. I also took an action (action item #6) to write this up for Part 0 so it will be clear in the proposal.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Alissa</div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Sep 22, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Daniel Karrenberg <<a href="mailto:daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net" class="">daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><br class=""><br class="">On 22.09.15 18:56 , Alissa Cooper wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">I also should have said: the goal is to agree final text of notes to be<br class="">sent to the OCs by the end of the call or shortly thereafter, if<br class="">possible. So if sub-teams are proposing to ask questions or send notes<br class="">to the OCs, they should send the text to the list before the call if at<br class="">all possible.<br class=""><br class="">Thanks,<br class="">Alissa<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">A recurring question in the "Workability/Q4" comments is about the<br class="">relationship of Protocol Parameters and Numbers to PTI. The RIRs have<br class="">stated that they expect to contract with ICANN albeit that Alan has<br class="">indicated some flexibility in the matter at our previous meeting. I<br class="">cannot find a strong statement from the IETF, is there one?<br class=""><br class="">I do not think we need to send a formal question about this at this time<br class="">because I expect such statements from both these OCs to their<br class="">communities anyway which we can use.<br class=""><br class="">If anyone feels that this indeed warrants the overhead of formal<br class="">questions, they should says so now so that we see if that has sufficient<br class="">support to ask these questions.<br class=""><br class="">Daniel<br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Internal-cg mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" class="">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br class=""><a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Internal-cg mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>