<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Alissa,<div><br></div><div>This response certainly sounds reasonable to me. I did note a couple of grammatical/typo type nits that Ive noted inline. </div><div><br></div><div>Russ M </div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Alissa Cooper <<a href="mailto:alissa@cooperw.in">alissa@cooperw.in</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>All,</div><div><br></div><div>Here is a proposed response to this comment. What do you think?</div><div><br></div><div>Alissa</div><div><br></div><div>----</div><div><br></div><div><div>Dear Richard,<br><br>Thank you for submitting your comments to the ICG. We note your view on the process for consensus in CWG Stewardship for the document produced.</div><div>The ICG also notes that the CWG Stewardship has taken notice of your view as explained in email from Lise Fuhr that can be found here: <<a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/2015-August/004054.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/2015-August/004054.html</a>>.<br><br>The ICG evaluation of how the CWG Stewardship process meets the NTIA requirements is in the ICG document that is out for open consultation as explained here: <<a href="https://www.ianacg.org/calls-for-input/combined-proposal-public-comment-period/">https://www.ianacg.org/calls-for-input/combined-proposal-public-comment-period/</a>>.<br><br>Regrading the specific question on what is the basis for ICG to evaluate comments addressed to the </div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Regarding</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><div>operational communities, please have a look at section 2a in the ICG comments handling process <<a href="https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/Community-Comments-Handling-1May15-final.pdf">https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/Community-Comments-Handling-1May15-final.pdf</a>>, which says "ICG in its discretion will raise the issues or question to the relevant OC with a request that they provide a timely and appropriate reply." This was exactly what ICG did.</div><div><br>In general the ICG had the ability at any time to make a statement as long as we fulfil our mandate and</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div> has</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><div> charter. Furthermore, the original comments posted in the ICG Forum were not addressed to the CWG Stewardship but instead addressed to the ICG, and because of that the ICG did take action.</div><div><br>Kind Regards,</div><div> </div><div>Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG<br></div></div><div><br></div><br><div><div>On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:00 AM, Jennifer Chung <<a href="mailto:jen@icgsec.asia">jen@icgsec.asia</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1;"><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Dear All,<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">The following comment has been posted to the ICG Forum today:<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">7 August Comment on handling of my previous comment on the CWG-Stewardship proposal from Richard Hill.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-August/000003.html" style="color: rgb(149, 79, 114); text-decoration: underline;">http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/icg-forum_ianacg.org/2015-August/000003.html</a><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Best Regards,<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Jennifer<o:p></o:p></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>Internal-cg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" style="color: rgb(149, 79, 114); text-decoration: underline;">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br><a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" style="color: rgb(149, 79, 114); text-decoration: underline;">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a></div></blockquote></div><br></div>_______________________________________________<br>Internal-cg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>