<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">My apologies to colleagues \u2013 I have not found the more positive text on not replacing the administrative and clerical oversight role of NTIA for changes to
the root-zone content & WHOIS databases that I thought was in the CWG proposal. I was sure it was in an annex! Blame short-term memory loss
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:#1F497D">L</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">The point I was trying to make was that, while the independent NTIA role was not being transferred to a new entity (the issue is one of introducing a new gatekeeper),
this does not limit the responsibility of the PTI for ensuring that its changes are accurate and properly authorised through its own procedures (and, as necessary, with the procedures of the root-zone maintainer). But errors would be subject to the defined
emergency procedures and would be reported for discussion with the CSC. I\u2019d also note the idea of a formal study (paragraph 1150 3 a-d) post transition to assess whether additional changes are needed.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">So sorry for wasting your time on this \u2013 I don\u2019t like the negative language (that we are discontinuing a role) unqualified by the reasons for discontinuation,
but fault of finding existing wording, I back down.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Martin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Alissa Cooper<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 29 July 2015 09:46<br>
<b>To:</b> IANA etc etc Coordination Group<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Internal-cg] Proposal - 24 hrs review<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Attached is v7 of the proposal, reflecting the changes discussed on the call. There are three items not yet reflected:<br>
<br>
\u2014 Changes to the IANA requests diagram flagged by Alan<br>
\u2014 Changes to the visual summary diagram as discussed with Russ Mundy<br>
\u2014 Text related to NTIA\u2019s authorization role to be provided on the mailing list by Martin<br>
<br>
I believe everything else has been captured in v7. The changes are also reflected in the executive summary and have been propagated as appropriate to the public comment web site.<br>
<br>
We will turn around the diagram changes as soon as we can.<br>
<br>
Deadline for any final feedback is 5:00 UTC on July 30.<br>
<br>
Jennifer: please add this document to Dropbox.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Alissa<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">_______________________________________________<br>
Internal-cg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>