<div dir="ltr"><div>Patrik</div><div>What you want is just what you want.</div><div>I do not understand you and nor agreed that any ICG either co chairs or individual member impose his or het views to the entire ICG.</div><div>We need to have a coordinated and harmonised process which all OCs use in their reply.</div><div>I therefore support Joe, s views and disagree with your views.</div><div>There is no " I" in our process rather we all should agree</div><div>Tks</div><div>Regards </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-05-23 17:21 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Patrik</div><div>What you want is just what you want.</div><div>I do not understand you and nor agreed that any ICG either co chairs or individual member impose his or het views to the entire ICG.</div><div>We need to have a coordinated and harmonised process which all ICs use in their reply.</div><div>I therefore support Joe, s views and disagree with your views.</div><div>There is no " I" in our process rather we all should agree</div><div>Tks</div><div>Regards </div><div><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><div class="h5"><div><br>On 23 May 2015, at 11:12, joseph alhadeff <<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
Patrik:<br>
<br>
Do we need any semblance of coherence in how all communities
interpret implementation to assure that their responses make sense
when conjoined in our proposal?<br>
<br>
Joe<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 5/23/2015 1:16 AM, Patrik Fältström
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>On 23 May 2015, at 6:33, WUKnoben wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>My suggestion is to be a little bit more formal meaning that the ICG letter should be addressed to the chairs of the three OCs since the ICG response to NTIA shall be formal, too.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>Although I did say something different in an earlier response, I agree this can be a good alternative.
We as chairs of ICG got the letter, and then the chairs of the OCs can get whatever ICG send.
I just do not feel we ICG should push and force the OCs into some processes that are not needed. I want them to have as much freedom as possible to choose whatever process they want to use to be able to respond to the question.
Patrik
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a>
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Internal-cg mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>