<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Wu,</div><div>Then what the problem that since a week every body making panic that ICANN STAFF BREAKING THE RULES.</div><div>Please ,as ICANN Liaison to ICG clarify the matter to every body so as no more panic is made.</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-05-02 19:32 GMT+02:00 Wu Kuo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kuoweiwu@gmail.com" target="_blank">kuoweiwu@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear Kavouss,<br>
<br>
As IETF and NRO making their update information recently, that is what happened as Milton questioned. As I checked with board and ICANN staff, ICANN has no intention to change the proposals from IETF and CRISP, and strongly support ICG working on its proposal based on IETF and CRISP delivered (also the potential proposal from CWG) again. I have nothing more to add than the information from IETF and NRO.<br>
<span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
Kuo Wu<br>
<br>
\u5f9e\u6211\u7684 iPhone \u50b3\u9001<br>
<br>
</span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> \u65bc 2015\u5e745\u67083\u65e5 01:08 \u5beb\u9053\uff1a<br>
><br>
> Dear Wu<br>
> Thanks for your bon office<br>
> Kavouss<br>
><br>
> Sent from my iPhone<br>
><br>
>> On 28 Apr 2015, at 16:23, Wu Kuo <<a href="mailto:kuoweiwu@gmail.com">kuoweiwu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks for sharing your information. I just back from a trip, and arrived home few minutes ago. I will read it ASAP.<br>
>><br>
>> But I have to say, ICANN has MOU with NRO and IETF for years as you know. This is not a secret at all. Again, I have to read the information you gave, and get back to ICG ASAP.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks.<br>
>><br>
>> Kuo Wu<br>
>><br>
>> \u5f9e\u6211\u7684 iPhone \u50b3\u9001<br>
>><br>
>>> Milton L Mueller <<a href="mailto:mueller@syr.edu">mueller@syr.edu</a>> \u65bc 2015\u5e744\u670828\u65e5 22:17 \u5beb\u9053\uff1a<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Kuo-wei<br>
>>> Here is Alissa's original message.<br>
>>> <a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/2015-April/000236.html" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/2015-April/000236.html</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> You might also be interested in my recent blog post on the topic<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/" target="_blank">http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> It is not about whether ICANN can "stop ICG's action" it is about whether it can unilaterally dictate changes in the operational community proposals, effectively circumventing the ICG process.<br>
>>><br>
>>> --MM<br>
>>><br>
>>>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>>>> I didn't read the statement from Alissa yet. I will response after I read<br>
>>>> it. And ICG is an independent group, unless ICG want to get comment<br>
>>>> what ICANN board. I don't see what we can stop ICG's action, isn't it?<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Internal-cg mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>