<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Martin</div><div>I wish to receive your kind reply about the distribution / repartition of the Current NTIA to Future ICANN ( acting as NTIA 9 AND csc ( PERFPORMING OPERATION FUNCTIONS OF NTIA)</div><div>Pls kindly advise which NTIA CURRENT FUNCTIONS will be performed by ICANN as per CWG output and which current NTIA function will be perfomned by CSC</div><div>It is not clear </div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-04-24 21:40 GMT+02:00 Mary Uduma <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mnuduma@yahoo.com" target="_blank">mnuduma@yahoo.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><div>Thank you Milton for the clarifications.��</div><div dir="ltr">I guess these are still some of the fine tuning and gaps to be filled by the� CWG-IANA</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div><br></div><div dir="ltr"><span>Mary Uduma</span></div></font></span><div><div class="h5"> <br><div><br><br></div><div style="display:block"> <div style="font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px"> <div style="font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> On Friday, April 24, 2015 2:13 PM, Milton L Mueller <<a href="mailto:mueller@syr.edu" target="_blank">mueller@syr.edu</a>> wrote:<br> </font> </div> <br><br> <div><div><div>
<div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt">Mary:</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt">Your questions may have been answered by someone else during the call but I didn\u2019t see any responses so I will give it a go:</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11pt"> �</span></div>
<div style="border-width:medium medium medium 1.5pt;border-style:none none none solid;border-color:currentColor currentColor currentColor blue;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt">
<div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>Is CWG proposing that ICANN can sack PTI?�
</span></div>
<div style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11pt"> �</span></div>
<div style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11pt">MM: Yes, but not unilaterally, there is a review process anchored in the names community that it would have to do through. Some of the
details of the review and separation process are not specified yet.</span></div>
<div style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11pt"> �</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>Will ICANN sack the Board, Mangement or staff?�</span><span></span></div>
<div style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11pt"> �</span></div>
<div style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11pt">MM: Here again we need to distinguish between \u201cICANN\u201d (the corporation) and ICANN community. The review process could lead to calls for
changes in the PTI board, and I think the CSC would also have an escalation process that could lead to pressure on the PTI board.</span></div>
<div style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11pt"> �</span></div>
<div style="background:white"><span>Would ICANN� register another Affiliate to carry on the IANA Functions since PTI is� not� totally independent of ICANN?</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span> �</span></div>
<div style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11pt">MM: Who got the new names-IANA contract would depend on the outcome of an RFP I believe
</span></div><div></div><div>
</div></div><div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span> �</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span> �</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span> �</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span> �</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span> �</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span> �</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background:white"><span> �</span></div>
<div>
<div style="background:white;margin-bottom:12pt"><span> �</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10pt">On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 6:02 PM, Martin Boyle <<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</a>> wrote:</span><span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background:white;margin-bottom:12pt"><span> �</span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>Hi Kavouss,</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>�</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>There seems to me that there was some confusion between us on the role of the NTIA and how the names proposal would address this.�
</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>�</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>The NTIA has a number of roles \u2013 identified in the document which went to consultation in December.� I\u2019m sorry if I did not make clear that I was looking
at NTIA\u2019s role in letting the contract and its ability to terminate and re-tender.</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>�</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>One key part of the CWG\u2019s discussion has been focussed on separability \u2013 a role that NTIA currently has by virtue of its contract with ICANN for the role
of IANA functions operator.� The contract approach allows the role to be reassigned in the case of the IANA functions operator failing to meet obligations and failing to remedy the failings.</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>�</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>In the model in front of us today, at transition ICANN would take the NTIA responsibility for a contract with its affiliate (subsidiary) the PTI \u2013 where
PTI is the contractor currently providing the IANA functions operator, the IANA division in ICANN.�
</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>�</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>The role of the CSC is to carry out the operational responsibilities associated with managing the contract.� Its role is quite limited in that it monitors
performance against the agreed service level targets and works with PTI to ensure that concerns are addressed.� The CSC does not make the decision on the future of the contract.</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>�</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>For other roles of the NTIA, we recommend:</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>\u2022������������ Discontinuing the third party authorisation of changes to the registries;</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>\u2022������������ Further work on dealing with appeals on changes to the registries;</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>\u2022������������ Using the CSC and PRF to process changes to service level agreements and other operational conditions;� and
</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>\u2022������������ Using the CSC (and/or the PRF) to initiate discussion on structural or operational changes (the introduction of DNSSEC was the example I
used) but leave open for the moment who might authorise change.</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>(I might have missed something, so do not treat this as a definitive list.� There\u2019s also a lot of detail I have not covered.)</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>However, all of these would come back to ICANN to implement or cause to be implemented.</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>�</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>Hope this helps</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>�</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="background:white"><span>Martin</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="background:white;margin-bottom:12pt"><span><br clear="none">
_______________________________________________<br clear="none">
Internal-cg mailing list<br clear="none">
<a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br clear="none">
<a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div><div>
</div></div><div>
</div></div><div>
</div></div></div><br><div>_______________________________________________<br clear="none">Internal-cg mailing list<br clear="none"><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org" target="_blank" shape="rect">Internal-cg@mm.ianacg.org</a><br clear="none"><a href="http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank" shape="rect">http://mm.ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><br clear="none"></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>